The Republic’s Regrettable Recitation

The US Supreme Court says it will take up one of the most emotional legal questions to arise in many years: whether the Pledge of Allegiance, as recited by schoolchildren for half a century, should be banned. At issue, two words: “Under God.”

Listening to a right-wing radio station (WBAL AM 1090) this morning, I was stunned to hear the on-air newscaster present views from only one side of the issue. Soundbite after soundbite from listeners decried the possibility of losing the pledge they’ve always said. One upset USA-Firster even said, “The pledge is the way it has always been.”


The words “under God” were inserted into the pledge in the 1950s as part of then-Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s anti-Communist investigations. Frankly, I don’t buy into the mandatory pledging of fealty to a manmade construct; I don’t do the pledge to the flag (which means nothing to me, as its claim — “with liberty and justice for all” — is nothing more than a fantasy in the US, and I see the flag as being representative of a big, ugly lie). But when the nation is filled with many people who don’t buy into the concept of God and many of those who do are from varying faiths, the whole “under God” thing becomes merely a smack upside the head of those who do believe in freedom and equality for all. (And having been smacked, literally and figuratively, for refusing to take part in the pledge, I know this to be true.)

Bottom line: The US was founded on the principle of religious freedom — but, regardless of what some fundamentalist Christians may say, it was not founded as a Christian or Judeo-Christian nation. The founders themselves were a mottley assortment of men who believed many different things — some were Deists, some were Christians, some were freethinkers.

The pledge served its purpose (which I suspect is nothing more than keeping the sheep in check) for decades without the inclusion of “under God — and those words were inserted only because of hatred, intolerance, fear, and citizen control.

If the SCOTUS is smart, it will excise the offending words and allow God-worshippers to be “under God” in their own homes, in their own churches, mosques, halls, and temples, and in their own way. But it is immoral for the nation to insist that people who hold differing beliefs must be represented by something that excludes them. If the court refuses to cut the words, it ought to ban the whole pledge outright.

Posted in Uncategorized

9 thoughts on “The Republic’s Regrettable Recitation

  1. There’s lots of coverage on this in the local media, since Elk Grove isn’t that far from here. I’d say most people believe that the pledge was given to Moses with the ten commandments or at least scrawled out by George Washington’s own quill. Isn’t anyone still alive who remembers not having to say the pledge and can step up and say so?

  2. The whole “under God” argument is deflecting the real issue. The pledge of allegiance is an oath of obsequiousness to the government. Rather than citizens reciting this thing, the entire congress, the supreme court, the president and all others holding offices in the U. S., the states, counties and municipalities should pledge allegiance to the people. It’s quite backwards and has contributed to the psuedo-religiosity of America; reducing most of the people to mindless zombies who elect Arnold Schwarzenegger to the governorship of California and, doing so with the Bush debacle in Iraq within plain sight.

  3. Difficulties prevent me from making a formal posting, but here is a Reindeer Game sentence using the word of the day:

    The Pledge of Allegiance is execrable means of forcing citizens to submit to the will of its vile government.

  4. “Bottom line: The US was founded on the principle of religious freedom — but, regardless of what some fundamentalist Christians may say, it was not founded as a Christian or Judeo-Christian nation. The founders themselves were a mottley assortment of men who believed many different things — some were Deists, some were Christians, some were freethinkers.”

    that, my friend, is willful ignorance at its finest. we all know that most of the founding fathers were indeed christians, and i’m not sure how you could argue that the constitution itself and most of the laws that make up the entire US code are deeply rooted in judeo-christian philosophy. ben franklin mandated that every meeting of the newly formed congress would start with a prayer to the christian god. washington himself (you know, the father of the nation) said that the nation couldnt survive without being close to god and staying religious- keeping the ten commandments. madison was a christian, and jefferson was a christian to a certain degree- he surely believed in the philosophy that was the basis of the bible itself- which might explain why he kept the very foundation of the book (its very basic ideas and principles) IN when he wrote the jefferson bible. yet, youre trying to claim that the country wasnt founded on said philosophy? franklin, madison, washington, jefferson- and thats just the tip of the iceberg. these were our founding fathers, right? they all believed in the basic judeo-christian philosophy, yet the country WASN’T really founded in that philosophy? weird! i never knew!

    it’s okay that your personal beliefs and lifestyle don’t fit into the philosophy that formed the basis for our nation- no one is going to ask you to leave or anything. but, i think i can speak for most americans when i say that lying about the very basis of our country, because you disagree with it, is just downright despicable.

  5. Lying? You, with all due respect, are the one behaving despicably. I said what I have learned from my research on the issue. I said what I believe.

    It’s obvious you are here just to be nasty, so feel free to speak your piece, Mr. Bozeman, but I won’t engage you. I will leave you with this excerpt from Americans United for Separation of Church and wish you a good day, sir, and a good life. Oh, and I wish you peace.

    The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document. It contains no mention of Christianity or Jesus Christ. In fact, the Constitution refers to religion only twice –€“ in the First Amendment, which bars laws “respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” and in Article VI, which prohibits “religious tests” for public office. Both of these provisions are evidence that the country was not founded as officially Christian.

    The Founding Fathers did not create a secular government because they disliked religion. Many were believers themselves. Yet they were well aware of the dangers of church-state union. They had studied and even seen first-hand the difficulties that church-state partnerships spawned in Europe. During the American colonial period, alliances between religion and government produced oppression and tyranny on our own shores.

    Many colonies, for example, had provisions limiting public office to “Trinitarian Protestants” and other types of laws designed to prop up the religious sentiments of the politically powerful. Some colonies had officially established churches and taxed all citizens to support them, whether they were members or not. Dissenters faced imprisonment, torture and even death.

    These arrangements led to bitterness and sectarian division. Many people began agitating for an end to “religious tests” for public office, tax subsidies for churches and other forms of state endorsement of religion. Those who led this charge were not anti-religion. Indeed, many were members of the clergy and people of deep piety. They argued that true faith did not need or want the support of government.

    Respect for religious pluralism gradually became the norm. When Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, for example, he spoke of “unalienable rights endowed by our Creator.” He used generic religious language that all religious groups of the day would respond to, not narrowly Christian language traditionally employed by nations with state churches.

    While some of the country’s founders believed that the government should espouse Christianity, that viewpoint soon became a losing proposition. In Virginia, Patrick Henry argued in favor of tax support for Christian churches. But Henry and his cohorts were in the minority and lost that battle. Jefferson, James Madison and their allies among the state’s religious groups ended Virginia’s established church and helped pass the Virginia Statute for Religious Liberty, a 1786 law guaranteeing religious freedom to all.

    Jefferson and Madison’s viewpoint also carried the day when the Constitution, and later, the Bill of Rights, were written. Had an officially Christian nation been the goal of the founders, that concept would appear in the Constitution. It does not. Instead, our nation’s governing document ensures religious freedom for everyone. Maryland representative Luther Martin said that a handful of delegates to the Constitutional Convention argued for formal recognition of Christianity in the Constitution, insisting that such language was necessary in order to “hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism.” But that view was not adopted, and the Constitution gave government no authority over religion. Article VI, which allows persons of all religious viewpoints to hold public office, was adopted by a unanimous vote. Through ratification of the First Amendment, observed Jefferson, the American people built a “wall of separation between church and state.”

    Some pastors who favored church-state union were outraged and delivered sermons asserting that the United States would not be a successful nation because its Constitution did not give special treatment to Christianity. But many others welcomed the new dawn of freedom and praised the Constitution and the First Amendment as true protectors of liberty.

    Early national leaders understood that separation of church and state would be good for all faiths –€“ including Christianity. Jefferson rejoiced that Virginia had passed his religious freedom law, noting that it would ensure religious freedom for “the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, the infidel of every denomination.”

    Other early U.S. leaders echoed that view. President George Washington, in a famous 1790 letter to a Jewish congregation in Newport, R.I., celebrated the fact that Jews had full freedom of worship in America. Noted Washington, “All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship.”

    Washington’s administration even negotiated a treaty with the Muslim rulers of north Africa that stated explicitly that the United States was not founded on Christianity. The pact, known as the Treaty with Tripoli, was approved unanimously by the Senate in 1797, under the administration of John Adams. Article 11 of the treaty states, “[T]he government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion–€¦.”

    Admittedly, the U.S. government has not always lived up to its constitutional principles. In the late 19th century especially, officials often promoted a de facto form of Protestantism. Even the U.S. Supreme Court fell victim to this mentality in 1892, with Justice David Brewer declaring in Holy Trinity v. United States that America is “a Christian nation.”

    It should be noted, however, that the Holy Trinity decision is a legal anomaly. It has rarely been cited by other courts, and the “Christian nation” declaration appeared in dicta –€“ a legal term meaning writing that reflects a judge’s personal opinion, not a mandate of the law. Also, it is unclear exactly what Brewer meant. In a book he wrote in 1905, Brewer pointed out that the United States is Christian in a cultural sense, not a legal one.

    A more accurate judicial view of the relationship between religion and government is described by Justice John Paul Stevens in his 1985 Wallace v. Jaffree ruling. Commenting on the constitutional right of all Americans to choose their own religious belief, Stevens wrote, “At one time it was thought that this right merely proscribed the preference of one Christian sect over another, but would not require equal respect for the conscience of the infidel, the atheist, or the adherent of a non-Christian faith such as Mohammedism or Judaism. But when the underlying principle has been examined in the crucible of litigation, the Court has unambiguously concluded that the individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all.”

    A determined faction of Christians has fought against this wise and time-tested policy throughout our history. In the mid 19th century, several efforts were made to add specific references to Christianity to the Constitution. One group, the National Reform Association (NRA), pushed a “Christian nation” amendment in Congress in 1864. NRA members believed that the Civil War was divine punishment for failing to mention God in the Constitution and saw the amendment as a way to atone for that omission.

    The NRA amendment called for “humbly acknowledging Almighty God as the source of all authority and power in civil government, the Lord Jesus Christ as the Ruler among the nations, [and] His revealed will as the supreme law of the land, in order to constitute a Christian government.” Ten years later, the House Judiciary Committee voted against its adoption. The committee noted “the dangers which the union between church and state had imposed upon so many nations of the Old World” and said in light of that it was felt “inexpedient to put anything into the Constitution which might be construed to be a reference to any religious creed or doctrine.”

    Similar theocratic proposals resurfaced in Congress sporadically over the years. As late as 1950, a proposal was introduced in the Senate that would have added language to the Constitution that “devoutly recognizes the Authority and Law of Jesus Christ, Saviour and Ruler of nations, through whom are bestowed the blessings of liberty.” This amendment was never voted out of committee. Efforts to revive it in the early 1960s were unsuccessful.

    Today, America’s religious demographics are changing, and diversity has greatly expanded since our nation’s founding. The number of Jews has increased, and more Muslims are living in America than ever before. Other religions now represented in America include Hinduism, Buddhism and a myriad others. In addition, many Americans say they have no religious faith or identify themselves as atheists, agnostics or Humanists. According to some scholars, over 2,000 distinct religious groups and denominations exist in the United States.

    Also, even though most Americans identify as Christian, this does not mean they would back official government recognition of the Christian faith. Christian denominations disagree on points of doctrine, church structure and stands on social issues. Many Christians take a moderate or liberal perspective on church-state relations and oppose efforts to impose religion by government action.

    Americans should be proud that we live in a democracy that welcomes persons of many faiths and none. Around the globe, millions of people still dwell under oppressive regimes where religion and government are harshly commingled. (Iran and the former Taliban regime of Afghanistan are just two examples.) Many residents of those countries look to the United States as beacon of hope and a model for what their own nations might someday become.

    Only the principle of church-state separation can protect America’s incredible degree of religious freedom. The individual rights and diversity we enjoy cannot be maintained if the government promotes Christianity or if our government takes on the trappings of a “faith-based” state.

    The United States, in short, was not founded to be an officially Christian nation or to espouse any official religion. Our government is neutral on religious matters, leaving such decisions to individuals. This democratic and pluralistic system has allowed a broad array of religious groups to grow and flourish and guarantees every individual American the right to determine his or her own spiritual path –€“ or to reject religion entirely. As a result of this policy, Americans enjoy more religious freedom than any people in world history. We should be proud of this accomplishment and work to preserve the constitutional principle that made it possible –€“ separation of church and state.

  6. lol. im angry because you claim such nonsense? i love it! so, how does this work? does everyone who disagrees with you get the label of angry and hateful? or am i just really lucky?

    i mean, come on! you posted stuff from Americans United! separation of church and state, an idea totally created by the far left! a clause that is nowhere to be found in the constitution! you really take that nonsense seriously? you, AU, and the ACLU. thank god youre the minority in the U.S.

    either way- you claim that theres no judeo-christian basis for the foundation of the country, thats not a belief, its falsehood. why would men who strongly held true the philosophy of the bible form a govt based on a totally different idea? why did jefferson mandate that the bible be taught in any school he founded? if he was so against a religious america, wouldnt have stuck to that throughout his life? washington was a strict christian, yet he was all for a govt that alienated the very god he gave his life to? thats absurd and you know it!

    the american flag represents a big ugly lie, you say. again, who’s the angry one? i cant remember.

Comments are closed.