Truth, Lies, and Agendas

Just-retired Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir MohamadOctober’s 10th session of the Organization of the Islamic Conference summit in Putrajaya ignited controversy and fury around the world over speakers’ calls for the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims to unite against “a few million Jews” who, they charge, rule the world by controlling the world’s major powers. A number of Oct. 16 statements made by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who retired at month’s end, received particular condemnation from many who, rightfully, condemn violence, terrorism, and anti-Semitism. Here are selections of Mahathir’s words:

  • “Are we not allowed at all to criticize the Jews if they do things which are wrong?”
  • “Our only reaction is to become more and more angry. Angry people cannot think properly. And so we find some of our people acting irrationally. They launch their own attacks, killing just about everybody including fellow Muslims to vent their anger and frustration.”
  • “There is a feeling of hopelessness among the Muslim countries and their people. They feel they can do nothing right. They believe that things can only get worse.”
  • “But is it true that we should do and can do nothing for ourselves? Is it true that 1.3 billion people can exert no power to save themselves from the humiliation and oppression inflicted on them by a much smaller enemy? Is there no other way than to ask our young people to blow themselves up and kill people and invite the massacre of more of our own people?”
  • “We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. The Europeans killed 6 million Jews out of 12 million, but today the Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.”

Read the entire speech here.


Mahathir, as his hand-picked successor Abdullah Badawi looks on Mahathir’s anti-Western, anti-Israel comments are indeed incendiary and deserving of condemnation. However, he complains that Muslims are criticized routinely by the world’s media while Israel often gets a free pass — and he is right about that. While I stand fully against anti-Semitism in any form, I can’t help but think that beneath his harsh, sometimes vile rhetoric — de riguere for Mahathir during his 22 years in office — the retired Malaysian PM may have a point.

Mahathir said Israel is involved in anti-Palestine terrorism as it carries out a policy of destroying homes and killing people in revenge for any Palestinian attack against Israel. He is correct about that. Make no mistake: I believe that militant Palestinians are behaving unconscionably in their violent uprisals against the Israeli occupation of the lands in which they live. But I also believe that Israel too is behaving abominably in its anti-Palestine violence. Yes, some Palestinians, tragically, are involved in terrorism, but so is the government of Israeli leader Ariel Sharon.

But that is not the message delivered by Western leaders. Abul Mohsin, editorializing from Dhaka for Bangladesh’s Daily Star, explains, focusing on the US:

No US government has so far asked the Israeli government openly to vacate the occupied Palestinian territories as was demanded by the United Nations Security Ccouncil Resolution no. 242. But they wasted no time to invade Iraq, purportedly to destroy the elusive weapons of mass destruction which even UN inspectors could not find during their prolonged search. Nor the CIA could establish any link between Iraq and the Al-Queda, the latter being accused of the Sept. 11 attack on the WTC and the Pentagon in New York and Washington.

Even the UN fact-finding mission on Jenin massacre in 2002 was abandoned in the face of Israeli opposition, despite UNSC consent to conduct the investigation. The concrete boundary wall with electronic surveillance system that Israel is now erecting in the West Bank sits on Palestinian land. Israeli negtaion to dismantle the fence provides another proof that the US cannot do anything to stop Israel’s illegal activities.

Also consider that while Western leaders — including Dubya Bush — lined up publicly to rebuke Mahathir for his comments, Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin, a US defense department undersecretary, got off practically scot-free for his recent anti-Muslim remarks. And note that most Western news reports give little attention to this portion of Mahathir’s OIC address:

We also know that not all non-Muslims are against us. Some are well-disposed towards us. Some even see our enemies as their enemies. Even among the Jews there are many who do not approve of what the Israelis are doing.

We must not antagonise everyone. We must win their hearts and minds. We must win them to our side not by begging for help from them but by the honourable way that we struggle to help ourselves. We must not strengthen the enemy by pushing everyone into their camps through irresponsible and unIslamic acts. Remember Salah El Din and the way he fought against the so called Crusaders, King Richard of England in particular. Remember the considerateness of the Prophet to the enemies of Islam. We must do the same. It is winning the struggle that is important, not angry retaliation, not revenge.

It is clear to any objective eye that Western coverage is often one-sided and that many Western leaders are clearly in Israel’s camp. “Most of them are biased. Not all, most of them. And they feel that while it is proper to criticize Muslims and Arabs, it is not proper to criticize Europeans and Jews,” Mahathir said. “Apparently they think they are privileged people, but we don’t think so.”

But again, much of the criticism of Mahathir is valid. USA Today reports that Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Jonathan Peled expressed disappointment in the remarks but said he wasn’t surprised. “It is not new that in such forums there is always an attempt to reach the lowest common denominator, which is Israel bashing,” he said in Jerusalem. “But obviously we’d like to see more moderate and responsible kind of declarations coming out of such summits.”

The US House agreed. In a 411-0 vote, lawmakers passed a resolution saying his comments embodied “age-old stereotypes of Jewish global domination” and could incite secular violence.

While visiting Jerusalem, Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of Los Angeles’ Simon Wiesenthal Center, agreed, saying that Mahathir making anti-Israel statements is not new, but adding that his summit speech provoked great concern: “What is profoundly shocking and worrying is the venue of the speech, the audience and coming in the time we’re living in,” Cooper said while in Jerusalem. “Mahathir’s speech … is an absolute invitation for more hate crimes and terrorism against Jews. That’s serious.”

Indeed it is. Peter Symonds, commenting from the World Socialist Web Site, explains why:

His remark that “Jews rule this world” recalls the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories propagated by the Nazis that were used to justify the slaughter of millions of Jews in concentration camps during World War II. His outburst was racist to the core: “Europeans” as a whole were no more responsible for the holocaust than “Jews” as a whole are responsible for Zionism, the Israeli regime’s repression of the Palestinians or the militarist agenda of the Bush administration.

And, as Symonds notes, there is clearly an agenda behind Mahathir’s statements and the defenses of it he has made in the past two weeks.

Mahathir’s unabashed anti-Semitism was no slip of the tongue. It was consciously aimed at appealing to the millions throughout Malaysia and South East Asia who are outraged at the Bush administration’s “war on terror” and the assassinations, reprisals and terror carried out against Palestinian civilians by the Israeli regime. The remarks were an attempt to shore up his credentials as “a defender of Muslims” against criticisms–€”and political inroads–€”being made by more extreme Islamists.

Not only did Mahathir make the comment, he has defended it publicly for the last two weeks. During the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Thailand, he told the Bangkok Post on October 21 that the backlash in Europe and the US against his remarks “shows” that Jews control the world. The following day he lashed out at the “great exponents of democracy” for “terrorising the world”–€”a reference not only to Israel but to the methods being used by the US military to suppress opposition to its illegal occupation of Iraq. …

[T]he US Senate registered its disapproval by tying $1.2 million in military aid to Malaysia to a State Department review of the country’s attitude to religious freedom, particularly of Jews. Far from backing off, however, Mahathir further exacerbated the controversy by insisting, contrary to the White House, that Bush had not privately rebuked him at the ASEAN [Association of South East Asian Nations] summit for his remarks.[Emphasis mine.]

Publicly, Bush condemned the Malaysian leader’s words and his administration maintains that the US Resident did indeed criticize him on Oct. 20 at the ASEAN summit. But Mahathir’s accusation must be considered by those who question Bush’s veracity. Malaysia is considered an ally of sorts by the Bush Administration; the country is seen as a Muslim-moderate nation. And Dubya opposed the Senate’s action against Malaysia. So it can be seen that US leaders speaking against Mahathir’s statements want to reassure Israel — but not to the point of pissing off other moderate Muslim nations.

Mahathir, of course, had his own agenda for making his controversial comments. As Peter Symonds sees it,

Mahathir’s racist rhetoric over the last two weeks is an indication that he intends to play a major role as senior statesman, even in formal retirement. More fundamentally, however, it is a sign that the Bush administration’s “war on terrorism” and its unstinting support for Israel’s atrocities are unleashing social forces that loyal political allies like Mahathir are finding increasingly difficult to control.

The bottom line is this: What Mahathir said was reprehensible. Most Muslims are peace-loving people who condemn violence and terrorism as passionately as other decent people do. However, we must take a critical eye at what actually was said in its entirety — some of the former prime minister’s statements are worthy of consideration. And when Western leaders leap to cast aspersion, we must look at their motivations too. None of these officials or their words can be taken at face value. We must look at their actions as well and inform ourselves, using many diverse sources. That is how we can determine where truth lies.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized

One thought on “Truth, Lies, and Agendas

  1. WHY GEORGE W BUSH REALLY INVADED IRAQ !

    During the Reagan administration, CIA Director William Casey initiated the recruitment of Islamic fundamentalists from around the world to go to Afghanistan to fight in the decade-long guerrilla war against the Soviet military intervention. They received training in terrorist tactics, including the planting of bombs, from US intelligence agents. This was the milieu out of which Osama bin Laden–€”himself a collaborator with the CIA in Afghanistan–€”recruited the initial forces for his Al Qaeda organization. After the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, many of these fighters, most of them Arabs, were allowed entry into the United States as a reward for their services in the war.

    In the aftermath of the Persian Gulf War, some of these Islamic fundamentalists turned against the US government, bombing the World Trade Center in 1993.

    Al Queda then carried out a number of other terrorist acts against US targets overseas most notably the bombing of two U.S Embassies in East Africa and the attack on the U.S.S Cole before carrying out their murderous attacks on 9/11.

    That an organization like Al Qaeda would emerge after the CIA’s unbelievable stupidity in arming and training more than 35,000 (indirectly over 100,000) anti – western Islamic fundamentalists fighters –€“ should you would think not really come as such a surprise.

    Seemingly however those imbeciles who were actually responsible for this policy in the first place the Reaganites (many of whom today are key neoconservatives in the Bush administration) just can’t understand why the rabid dog that they spawned has now turned around and bit the hand that had fed it.

    Further it has now become clear (with no WMD’s being found ) that rather than face up to the truth behind 9/11 these short sighted ideologues have instead sought to ‘pull the wool over the eyes’ of the American public by manipulating George W Bush (whose father was one of the chief architects of this evil in the 1980ies) to invade Iraq, by claiming a link between Saddam and 9/11.

    One thing for certain is that whilst his baathist regime was very disagreeable, it however clearly had nothing to do with 9/11, being both strongly secular (supported by many Christian Iraqis) and very anti Wahabist (ie. anti Al Qaeda). From all accounts Bin laden hated Saddam as much as if not more than his ex – paymaster the U.S. Government.

    Basically the bottom line is we went to war on a lie – to cover up what must be one of the biggest screwups in modern history.

    BLOWBACK

    This phenomenon of former CIA-backed guerrillas using their US training to attack American targets has become known as –€śblowback.–€ť

    Technically a ‘blowback’ (what we call a right stuff up) is the term that the CIA uses to describe a situation when some operative, a terrorist, or some situation that they’ve created gets out of their control and comes back to haunt them. It’s a situation where the scientist (Frankenstein) creates a monster that “blows back” on its creator. Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden are all pretty good examples of blowback. They were all nurtured for many years by the CIA, the US military or military intelligence. They all eventually “blew back.”

    A good link to review this phenomenon is given in
    http://www.ncf.ca/coat/our_magazine/links/issue43/issue43.htm

    (January 2001: A People’s History of the CIA: The Subversion of Democracy from Australia to Zaire)

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF CIA SPONSORED TERRORISM –

    A brief history of C.I.A Sponsored Terrorism appears in the following WebPages, read these and get a better understanding of the role these maniacs have played in supporting and promoting this culture of terrorism that has now come back to haunt us all.

    Overview http://expage.com/notowar3a

    1947 – 1950 http://expage.com/notowar3b

    1951 – 1959 http://expage.com/notowar3c

    1960 – 1966 http://expage.com/notowar3d

    1967 – 1973 http://expage.com/notowar3e

    1974 – 1978 http://expage.com/notowar3f

    1979 – 1988 http://expage.com/notowar3g

    1989 – 2001 http://expage.com/notowar3h

    Source: William Blum, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995).

    OTHER NO TO WAR – AUSTRALIA LINKS

    For over half a century the C.I.A taught a host of murderous terrorists like Reagan’s so called –€śAfghan freedom fighters” to subvert popular movements how to murder, maim and torture their own people.

    To understand the depth of the C.I.A’s culpability for triggering the current world wide surge of Islamic terrorism which has already consumed so many innocent lives see the following websites.

    http://expage.com/notowar01

    Also see the following index’s for sites on George W. Bush and the illegal War and occupation of Iraq.

    http://expage.com/notowar1

    and

    http://expage.com/notowaroniraq1a

Comments are closed.