Crushing Free-Speech Crushing

The Marijuana Policy Project reports that Stand up for your rights! This quote from John Adams in the musical 1776 just never seems to go out of fashion:

“I have come to the conclusion that one worthless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a congress. And by God, I have had this Congress!”

Damn the Congress. God damn the Congress. It wasn’t enough to go after civil liberties — forget anything sensible that Ben Franklin had to say on the subject — in the name of “national security.” Now it appears Capitol Hill lawmakers want to go after the First Amendment in an effort to promote and prolong the shameful War on (Some) Drugs and a Plant.

Congress is on the verge of prohibiting ads supporting marijuana policy reform from being displayed on public transportation systems across the nation. What — we can’t use, buy or sell a plant that grows in Goid’s green earth, and Congress doesn’t even want us to consider any alternative ideas? As Adams says in 1776, Good God!

You can take action to halt this un-American move in its tracks. Send a fax to lawmakers demanding that they remove the “Istook Amendment” from the federal government’s omnibus spending bill. MPP has prepared 10 pre-written letters from which you can choose. Each of the letters not only objects to the Istook Amendment, but also educates members of Congress about the need to reform US marijuana laws.

MPP offers details on the congressional chicanery under way:

The provision at issue was inserted by U.S. Rep. Ernest Istook (R-OK) into the Consolidated Appropriations Act – 2004 (H.R. 2673) while this bill was in a House/Senate conference committee. The provision would prohibit all local transit agencies from displaying marijuana policy reform advertising if they receive funding from the federal government — which is most transit agencies.

This is just one more example of the desire by federal officials to have the public hear only one message on the subject of marijuana: “Marijuana is bad and must be prohibited.” Over the past six years, Congress has given the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to convey this message. But now that advocates of marijuana policy reform want to promote an alternative viewpoint — with their own money, no less — marijuana prohibitionists in Congress are trying to silence them. This is called “viewpoint discrimination,” and it violates the First Amendment.

MPP has a two-part plan for fighting this provision:

  • First, with your assistance, we will overwhelm congressional offices with faxes that oppose the provision and support marijuana policy reform. Please send
    one of these faxes today

  • Second, if this wave of public opposition does not result in the removal of the Istook Amendment, MPP will sue the federal government to have the provision declared unconstitutional. MPP will not only succeed in this legal fight, but we will also succeed in embarrassing the drug warriors when our legal fight generates free publicity for our issue.

Today, MPP is delivering a letter to Congressman Istook and the other members of Congress who will decide the fate of the Istook Amendment, outlining our plans to sue the government should this provision become law. Now is the time to share your own outrage with your three members of Congress. With your help, we can win the fight in Congress before it even makes it to the courts.

What are you waiting for? Get busy!

Posted in Uncategorized

2 thoughts on “Crushing Free-Speech Crushing

  1. Every time the government or anyone else puts some commercial
    on tv about marijuana it makes them look stupid. At least to
    people who are educated on the subject and have researched
    the facts about the drug. But in all this ignorance the
    conformed society friendly citizens of the US buy into the
    idea that marijuana is dangerous because of higher potencies
    and other stuff. Even though this is a complete falsehood.
    One of the arguements over the drug includes the fact that
    it impairs your judgement and makes you more likely to have
    an accident while you are driving. While I understand the
    concern, I don’t see what it has to do with keeping marijuana
    illegal. For example, alchohol is legal, but it’s just as
    dangerous if not more dangerous to drive drunk. I think the
    best choice to end the war on marijuana is for the government
    to legalize it, but under the same circumstances as alchohol.

Comments are closed.